 |
|
| Post PNR | Post Blog | Advanced Search |
20833/Visakhapatnam - Secunderabad Vande Bharat Expressविशाखपट्टणम - सिकंदराबाद वंदे भारत एक्सप्रेस
RJY/Rajahmundry --> BZA/Vijayawada Junction
Latest News
(You need to double-check/verify this info yourself)
🔹Train no. 20833/Visakhapatnam - Secunderabad Vande Bharat Express JCO 26/09/24, 27/09/24 and 28/09/2024 will be skipping Warangal, thereby providing stoppage at Kazipet Jn (KZJ).
Fri Sep 20, 2024 (11:46PM)
Fri Sep 20, 2024 (11:46PM)
4 Follows Bedroll/Linen: NOT Available Inaugural Run Sun Jan 15, 2023 Pantry/Catering ✕ Pantry Car ✓ On-board Catering ✓ E-Catering Breakfast served:- Bread/Upma, Omelette, Cutlet, Ketchup, Idly, Vada, Sambar, Chutney, Kesari,... more... | Updated: Aug 10 (12:59) by Kumaon_Tiger^~
RSA - Rake Sharing No RSA, PM @ VSKP With RPBC. | Rating: 5.0/5 (72 votes) cleanliness - excellent (12) punctuality - excellent (12) food - excellent (12) ticket avbl - excellent (12) railfanning - excellent (12) safety - excellent (12) | ||||
Loco Reversals | ||||||
TrainSet Rake Rake/Coach Position 0 C1 1 C2 2 C3 3 C4 4 C5 5 C6 6 C7 7 E1 8 E2 9 C8 10 C9 11 C10 12 C11 13 C12 14 C13 15 C14 BZA | ||||||
Train Forum
May 15 (20:06) 20833/Visakhapatnam - Secunderabad Vande Bharat Express | SLO/Samalkot Junction (3 PFs)
Cocanada~
Cocanada~ 495 blog postsYes from 3rd August is not showing in both directions. It has good boarding and deboarding in both directions.
1 Posts
Jul 15 (13:45) 20834/Secunderabad - Visakhapatnam Vande Bharat Express | KMT/Khammam (3 PFs)
AnjaneyaPrasad~
AnjaneyaPrasad~ 154 blog posts
Jul 11 (14:37) 20833/Visakhapatnam - Secunderabad Vande Bharat Express | VSKP/Visakhapatnam Junction (8 PFs)
vgirik69
vgirik69 101 blog postsIn every month 20833/34 becoming sick at least 3 or 4 times. ECoR should seriously look and if required, the faulty rake can be replaced with new one. Today also the rake became sick.
click here
click here
Jan 23 2023 (10:37) 20834/Secunderabad - Visakhapatnam Vande Bharat Express | SC/Secunderabad Junction (10 PFs)
RailwayFiles~
RailwayFiles~ 279 blog posts
5 Posts
Sorry for the late response brother... even I'm also hoping that they don't get phased out... atleast they should plan it properly so that there won't be any clashes in the timings like the Chennai Mysuru VB and Shatabdi... fingers crossed brother..🤞🤞🤞
The Shatabdi express will be replaced by VB once 75 VB target is reached for Sitting class. RB will rake a decision and cap the age of 10- 15yrs of run and replace with VB
Let's wait and see as to what's gonna happen.... now there r talks regarding the 9th VB... before CSMT series, all of us, rather most of us thought it was confirmed that it would be HWH-PURI VB, but now we see that CSMT series is coming up and occupying the 9th and 10th place... so what can be think of this???
News item appeared in 2019 that Vande Bharat will be introduced from Mumbai to Shirdi
click here
/blog/post/5607978
click here
/blog/post/5607978
May 31 (18:43) 20833/Visakhapatnam - Secunderabad Vande Bharat Express
Krishnareddy
Krishnareddy 55 blog postsWhy hasn’t the Railway Board designated Eluru as a stop for the VB train, similar to other district headquarters? Introducing a stop at Eluru would be beneficial as it would connect district headquarters directly to the main city like visakhapatnam and hyderabad
4 Posts
Based on Commercial justification halts will be decided or any political lobbying
Don't compare Visakhapatnam SC VB with BBS VB. Later was given stops as intercity to get occupancy but failed to attract travellers and is running with 50% occupancy. Dts headquarters doesn't necessary need a halt it's running with good occupancy and another stoppage will eat Vizag quota.
If vande bharat have stop at district headquarters, then it is useful to go to main city in less duration of time. and im saying about dist headquarters only not other stations
Not needed, EE is already well connected to both VSKP & SC by a plethora of other trains...
No specific reason as to why VB has to specifically stop here...
No specific reason as to why VB has to specifically stop here...